Which classification is for anomalies that require more resources to contain completely or where containment isn't always reliable (including autonomous or sapient SCPs)?

• A. Safe-Class
• B. Euclid-Class
• C. Thaumiel-Class
• D. Keter-Class

Answer: (B)

The concept being tested is how predictable containment is and how much effort it requires. Anomalies that are easy to keep contained with standard procedures fall into Safe. When containment becomes more demanding and less reliable—often because the entity behaves unpredictably or requires ongoing, adaptive measures to stay contained—it's placed in Euclid. This category fits cases where an SCP might act autonomously or be sapient, making static containment tricky and demanding more resources, monitoring, and flexible protocols. Keter would be for those that are exceptionally hard to contain or pose extreme danger, while Thaumiel covers SCPs designed to help contain or counter other SCPs. So, for anomalies that need more resources and aren’t consistently reliable to contain, Euclid is the best fit.